Now Playing Tracks

It is not the first time that I notice watching a sequel back to back to the film(s) it comes before gives me the impression that it allows me to appreciate it (and maybe understand it?) better than all those who watched it when it first came in the theatres, years after having seen the original. Many, in fact, regards The Godfather: Part III to be the weakest of the trilogy, but when I saw it shortly after the first two ones, I found it to be the most touching and moving of them all. While the Part I was very “straight to the point” and Part II (by the most regarded as the best of them) was the first all over again in a bigger budgeted, enhanced version, the third was a completely new, different and mature story about moral doubt, old age and love - the pure, honest love of a father for his family.

The same happened to me with ELIZABETH: THE GOLDEN AGE. I liked it more than the previous film, which I watched just the other night. Although there were apparently still many historical inaccuracies, I find myself more prone to forgive the filmmakers this time around, given the great spectacle they were finally able to put together. The character of the queen was much more interesting and in my opinion much better explored, and the director devised also more cinematographic frames worhty of this name.

Will a third and final film come in another 9 years?

Since I started studying heritage cinema in university I have been longing to watch Shekhar Kapur’s ELIZABETH (1998) expecting great visuals, great acting and a great story. While the acting was fine, I have to say that I found the visual style of Kapur to be somewhat regular - not bad, but nothing too daring or striking as well. Even the story left me somewhat disappointed: while it wasn’t boring, it did not engage me nor make me care much for its characters either. Everything just “happened”, but without provoking any emotional resonance in me. But the most disappointing thing of all is perhaps the amount of historical inaccuracies (artistic licenses?) portrayed in the film, so much that it could hardly be defined a “historical film”. While I do understand that real life does not occur with the same pace and structure required by drama, I wonder whether all these changes were indeed necessary, and an interesting film could have been made by staying faithful to what are believed to be the true events of such an important period of British history.

Despite it all, I can’t wait to watch the sequel Elizabeth: The Golden Age.

To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union